Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mick Veldheer vs Maxime Chazal Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Veldheer vs Chazal analysis and find out who is favored!
Mick Veldheer vs Maxime Chazal Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Veldheer 1 - 0 Chazal
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Veldheer has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Chazal has won 46.32%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Veldheer, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chazal has won 51.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.27% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Veldheer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chazal has saved 62.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Veldheer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 2), with Chazal winning 55.77% (W/L 29/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Veldheer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 38/ 28), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 128/ 112). Chazal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 412/ 243), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Veldheer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Chazal has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.79% of matches (W/L 25/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Veldheer winning 0 times and Chazal being victorious 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Veldheer winning 0 and Chazal winning 1. The last match between Veldheer and Chazal was at the Hungary F2 (Zalaegerszeg), 15-05-2018, First, Clay with Mick Veldheer getting the victory 3-6 3-3 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Veldheer and Chazal have played a deciding set 1 times, with Veldheer winning 1 times and Chazal 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Veldheer winning 0, and Chazal 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Veldheer has played against opponents with an average rank of 507 while Chazal has played against players with an average rank of 207.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Veldheer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chazal has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Veldheer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chazal has converted 45.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
882
Rank
509
High
28
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
561
Rank
234
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
55% (229-191)
Career Total W/L
60% (448-294)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
56% (14-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,860
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mick Veldheer | Maxime Chazal |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 1 |
| Games Won | 6 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:0 | 1:43:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (28/42) | 61% (50/82) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 50% (14/28) | 56% (28/50) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 21% (3/14) | 47% (15/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 23% (3/13) | 63% (5/8) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (39/82) | 60% (25/42) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 3-3 ret. |
Stats 
Mick Veldheer
Player
Maxime Chazal
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
50%
(
14 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
21%
(
3 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
60%
(
25 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
56
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mick Veldheer | Maxime Chazal |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (14/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (32/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (279/265) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 64% (14/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 38 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:57:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 156.64 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (1131/1783) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (770/1131) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (302/652) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 45% (78/173) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (700/1703) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 70% (14/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (14/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 75% (16/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (16/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Mick Veldheer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marvin Moeller
Player
Mick Veldheer
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Mick Veldheer
55%
(
70 of
128)
1st Serve %
55%
(
74 of
135)
13
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
12
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
52 of
74)
60%
(
35 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
34%
(
44 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
53 of
135)
137
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(7) 6-3 7-6(13) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Florig
Player
Mick Veldheer
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lukas Neumayer
Player
Mick Veldheer
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Mick Veldheer
50%
(
38 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mick Veldheer
Player
Timofey Stepanov
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Mick Veldheer
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gian Matias Di Natale
Player
Mick Veldheer
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksandr Bulitski
Player
Mick Veldheer
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | ||
view more
Maxime Chazal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Maxime Chazal
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
95)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
49 of
67)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Theo Papamalamis
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Arthur Reymond
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Simon Beaupain
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
69%
(
76 of
110)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
50 of
76)
44%
(
21 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
110)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Maxime Chazal
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Maxime Chazal
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Maxime Chazal
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Jasza Szajrych
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Noah Perfetti
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Veldheer Vs Chazal Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Maxime Chazal
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
